I used ACR to bring it in to photoshop with only adjusting the exposure up the two stops. Also, being able to selectively do the clean-up to various parts of an image.Īs an example, I had a basic heads/shoulder portrait that was two stops underexposed and at ISO400. I think that the hardest thing is getting the settings correct after fine tuning. Grain Surgery v2? (or have you tried it?) (With text selectively bolded and/or in a distinctive colors to "Click HERE to see the incredible results." Incredible difference and the pic really highlights the Side-by-side image and put the copy on P1 as a "teaser," as in The only thing I can think of that would be to duplicate the final
Look forward to seeing the follow-on tutorial Image but the bottom line is I can't do any better with it than I like some of the interface aspects of Grain Surgery over Neat That pic almost sold me on the NI plug-in, cept I already have Grain Surgery v1. right up front show the very impressive Before/After image or include an easy-to-spot link to it. Just need to stick to a work fl ow and want your opinion.since Iĭecided to shoot Raw. Breeze browser yarc plus, adobe raw, zoom browzer etc. I dont want to beat a dead horse but what is the best way to work G-2) says that its for breeze browser does that make a difference. Ill look at the tute in a profile for my camera (
Can't beat it!Ī rather simple method of using the Neat Image plugin for skin I use Neat Image on a lot of my stuff because I've found ways of using it that it wasn't really designed for. I would recommend this as a starting point to establishing a good workflow as mine wouldn't work for you: Adobe RAW convertor is a plugin so that is one advantage although I haven't tried it personally as I use Capture One. Breeze and Yarc are Canon SDK based convertors so output will be identical unless you use any of the post processing features like noise reduction, sharpening, or ARF (YarcPlus).